The Big Shoe Dance — Trump Style

Among the stranger details to emerge from Trump’s orbit is his reported habit of gifting dress shoes to cabinet members, a small act of patronage that somehow manages to be both absurd and par for the course. Apparently, he does not even bother asking what size the recipient wears. He simply decides what each man ought to need and has the shoes sent along, as though even their feet are subject to his personal authority.


One of the more revealing images making the rounds is of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the guy Republicans like to point to as the supposed adult in the room, wearing a pair of those Trump-gifted Florsheims that appear to be at least two sizes too big. It is hard to project steadiness and gravitas when you look like you borrowed your shoes from a larger, more confident man.

Trump is president. He can hand out whatever tokens of favor he likes. Most presidents settle for challenge coins, signing pens, framed photographs, or the usual ceremonial keepsakes, small symbols of office, not personal accessories chosen like loyalty costumes. But if Trump is going to make shoe-gifting part of the ritual, then We the People should insist on one small change: make them big, floppy clown shoes.

And really, Marco Rubio should be the prototype. The next time he steps forward to play the role of sober statesman, chin lifted and voice measured, pretending to embody the calm, adult sensibility Republicans keep assuring us is still somewhere in the room, he ought to be doing it in a pair of comically oversized circus wingtips. Because that would at least bring the image into alignment with reality: not dignity, not steadiness, not adult supervision, but a ridiculous little performance of borrowed seriousness, tottering forward in full costume.

That way, when Pete Hegseth is standing at a podium barking at reporters about some chyron or trying to sell the public on his latest deeply unpopular war, all we have to do is glance down. There they are: clown shoes. A perfect visual aid. When he summoned the nation’s generals and admirals and then launched into a tirade about “fat generals,” the assembled career military leaders might have been less bewildered if his footwear had already announced: don’t take me seriously. A reminder not to confuse volume with seriousness, swagger with competence, or costume with credibility.

And then there is Scott Bessent, testifying in that patented style of elite contempt, looking down his nose as though the room were beneath him and smelled like it. If we could have followed that stare all the way down the line of tailored self-importance to a pair of clown shoes at his feet, the whole act might have landed a little more honestly. It would not have improved the testimony, but it would at least have dressed it correctly.

Then comes Howard Lutnick, who may by now have overtaken JD Vance as the second-best liar in this assembly of absurdity, delivering his lines with the snake-oil confidence of a man who assumes audacity can substitute for honesty. If we could have looked down and seen clown shoes at the end of that expensive suit, the entire scene would have snapped into focus. Not integrity. Not seriousness. Not public service. Just another carnival barker in the Trump roadshow.

As heretofore reported, Trump has limited his footwear distribution to male members of his cabinet. But why stop there?

If Pam Bondi had gone before the House and Senate waving her little murder book, snapping at members of Congress when she did not like the questions, and lecturing them on what they should have been asking instead, maybe all we would have needed to do was look down. If she had been standing there in a pair of obnoxiously oversized high-heeled clown shoes, maybe the whole performance could have been received as it deserved, not as solemn governance, but as farce. Maybe then we could have laughed the whole ridiculous thing off.

And maybe Kristi Noem, in her shiny new role as special envoy to the Shield of America, or whatever piece of bureaucratic cosplay they are calling it this week, should lace up a pair too. That way, from the very beginning, the public would know exactly what sort of performance to expect. And if nobody can ever quite explain what this new role is, what it does, or why it exists, the clown shoes would serve as a perfectly adequate mission statement.

Because that is really what these people are asking of the country now: not respect, but submission to spectacle. Not belief in competence, but surrender to theater. The clown shoes would not make them less dangerous, less dishonest, or less absurd. But they would at least make the branding honest. And in an administration built on performance, that would be a rare courtesy.

I'm just saying.

Comments

-- OSG Share bar

Popular posts from this blog

Access Journalism Has Entered the Chat

‘I Don’t Even Know What That Means’: Theatrics Over Accountability

Make Up a Date, Make Up a Deal

Whistle While You Lie: The Subtle Art of Coded Speech

Who Get's to Be an American?

ICE Agents Are Wearing Masks — and the Public Should Be Alarmed

When Courage Ducks and Covers

We Dropped the Bomb, He Wore a Hat.

Regime Change

Healthcare Was Never the Enemy

-- More Posts