You Lost the Election. The Courts Agreed. History Isn’t Negotiable.

In late January 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice, acting through the Federal Bureau of Investigation, seized 2020 election ballots and records from Fulton County under a court-approved warrant—more than five years after the election was certified, recounted, audited, and exhaustively litigated. No new allegation of fraud was announced, no criminal charge disclosed, and no evidence surfaced that could alter the settled result. The most plausible purpose of the seizure, therefore, is not discovery but reexamination: an effort to enable a retrospective recount in service of a claim that has already failed in every legal forum. Even if such a recount were conducted, it could not change history or law; it could only provide an official-looking pretext to keep insisting that a concluded election somehow remains unresolved.

So, let me get this straight.
You LOST in 2020 to Joe Biden. 

You went to court more than 60 times, arguing in front of many of the judges you yourself appointed, and lost in each and every case, establishing a uniform legal record of failure rather than a contested dispute. 

You assembled alternate slates of electors in states that you lost and tried to have THOSE electors seated instead, justified by nothing more than “

You tried to extort the governor of Georgia into “finding” the exact number of ballots you lost by, plus one—a specificity that only makes sense if the loss itself was already known and privately accepted. That call revealed not belief in fraud, but intimate familiarity with the math. Which makes the January 2026 seizure of ballots in Georgia read less like an investigation and more like a rerun: same state, same numbers, same refusal to accept that counting them again will not make them change.

You summoned your supporters to report to the ellipse on January 6, where you instructed them to march down the street to the U.S. Capitol, wreak havoc, find Mike Pence, and if he didn’t do as instructed, hang him; language that collapses any pretense of metaphor or peaceful intent. (BTW, he’d already told you that in his constitutional review, his role was simply ceremonial and he did NOT have the power to overturn the election of, by, and for the people, so in essence, you summoned the angry mob specifically to commit murder, fully informed that their objective was both illegal and impossible.) 

When your Secret Service team refused to take you to the site of the insurrection, you sat sulking in the White House dining room, watching the chaos and ignoring pleas from your staff, your advisors, and even your daughter, to call for an end to the madness and tell your makeshift militia of a mobilized, misinformed mass of radicalized reactionaries and rule-rejecting rabble-rousers to stop the madness and go home, thereby allowing violence to function as a proxy for your will. Inaction, in this context, was not neutrality; it was endorsement by omission, the quiet permission that made continued harm possible.

After being adjudicated a rapist and thrice convicted of felonies; after knowingly stealing thousands of classified documents, refusing to return them, and even lying to your legal defense team about the status of those documents; after holding close to 40 campaign rallies, which more resembled a poorly written stand-up comedy routine where people only laughed because it looked better on camera than scratching their heads incessantly; after calling for the outright assassination of Liz Cheney, a threat that normalized political violence as acceptable rhetoric… You somehow won reelection. Apparently, Joe Biden was just too old. Those same people who voted for a 79-year-old candidate and couldn't or wouldn't do the math, now choose to ignore the fact that you're as mad as a hatter, but I digress, because absurdity has become indistinguishable from justification. 

But how in the fuck is your number one priority now to rewrite history and somehow prove that you ACTUALLY won the 2020 election anyway, as if repetition could overwrite record. 

IDIOT

Here is the problem with that:

• You’re already back in the office again. Anyone who agrees with you that there was MASSIVE voter fraud in the 2020 election is lying, intellectually dishonest, or as cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs as you are. You don’t need to convince them, and you CANNOT convince the rest of the thinking world, because evidence is not a matter of volume or insistence. 

• You were IN CHARGE in 2020. You were the de facto head of all of the organizations that could have possibly rigged the election, so if there was, in fact MASSIVE voter fraud, you were the guilty party—a contradiction that collapses the accusation back onto its author. The claim defeats itself.
  
  
  

• Even if you could, beyond the shadow of a doubt, prove what you’re trying to prove—so what? It’s over. You can’t go back in time and be reinstalled as president in 2020, and if somehow you could, you also couldn’t be president now, because you would have served two consecutive terms, rendering the obsession legally meaningless and politically sterile. It is an argument without remedy, consequence, or utility.

I'm just saying.